Impossibility Results for Infinite-Electorate Abstract Aggregation Rules
نویسندگان
چکیده
aggregation rules Frederik Herzberg and Daniel Eckert IMW · Bielefeld University
منابع مشابه
Arrow theorems in the fuzzy setting
Throughout this paper, our main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical mod...
متن کاملThe possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
The new eld of judgment aggregation aims to nd collective judgments on logically interconnected propositions. Recent impossibility results establish limitations on the possibility to vote independently on the propositions. I show that, fortunately, the impossibility results do not apply to a wide class of realistic agendas once propositions like if a then b are adequately modelled, namely a...
متن کاملAggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean preferences: Arrovian impossibility results
Cerreia-Vioglio, Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Siniscalchi (Economic Theory, 48:341–375, 2011) have recently proposed a very general axiomatisation of preferences in the presence of ambiguity, viz. Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean (MBA) preference orderings. This paper investigates the problem of Arrovian aggregation of such preferences — and proves dictatorial impossibility results fo...
متن کاملJudgment Aggregators and Boolean Algebra Homomorphisms
The theory of Boolean algebras can be fruitfully applied to judgment aggregation: Assuming universality, systematicity and a sufficiently rich agenda, there is a correspondence between (i) non-trivial deductively closed judgment aggregators and (ii) Boolean algebra homomorphisms defined on the power-set algebra of the electorate. Furthermore, there is a correspondence between (i) consistent com...
متن کاملThe theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
This paper provides an introductory review of the theory of judgment aggregation. It introduces the paradoxes of majority voting that originally motivated the eld, explains several key results on the impossibility of propositionwise judgment aggregation, presents a pedagogical proof of one of those results, discusses escape routes from the impossibility and relates judgment aggregation to some...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Philosophical Logic
دوره 41 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012